MOU Letter “Labor Management Relations in Bargaining Unit 6”

Dear Mr. Gilb:

Since the implementation of the last, best and final offer (LBFO) began on September 18, 2007, labor relations in Bargaining Unit 6 could fairly be describes as abysmal. Management has begun to unilaterally force new post and bid systems .......

DPA Letter to EEs - Dated 12.14.07

SUBJECT: Status of Implemented Terms

In correspondence to you dated September 18, 2007, we informed you of our intention to implement certain terms and conditions of employment following the rejection of our final offer by CCPOA. In that correspondence we, informed you of our intention to implement all three years of the economics contained in that offer. 

CCPOA Memo re: DPA Letter - Dated 12.14.07

State Board, 

Yesterday, December 13,2007, we sent you a copy of the Department of Personnel Administration's (DPA) initial response letter to the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). In this letter, DPA has withdrawn the second and third year "economic proposals" of its (State's) implemented package. The significance ofthis is quite obvious in that, as we predicted long ago, this Administration never intended to honor any multiyear year package including any pay increase to Unit 6. Also, with the current budget problems created by this Administration, it remains to be seen whether the pay promised to Unit 6 for this year will happen.

In reading the letter further, you will note that the State "agrees" with CCPOA's complaint regarding the "omission" of the vice presidents' leave (VPL) in the last best and final. As a result, this section ofthe LBF  will presumably be honored by the State. That remains to be seen.  

DPA Letter - Dated 12.13.07

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California, et al.

UPC No. SA-CE-1621-S

Request for Dismissal

Dear Mr. Smith:

The California Correctional Peace Officers' Association (CCPOA), in its Second Amended Unfair Practice Charge, alleged that the State engaged in a number of unfair practices. On December 7,2007, the Office of the General Counsel of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) agreed with CCPOA on two matters and issued a complaint against the State of California (State). (See, separate PERB letters, dated December 7,2007, Notice of  Complaint and Partial Dismissal.)  

DPA Letter - Dated 12.13.07

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California, et al.

UPC No. SA-CE-1621-S

Request for Dismissal

Dear Mr. Smith:

The California Correctional Peace Officers' Association (CCPOA), in its Second Amended Unfair Practice Charge, alleged that the State engaged in a number of unfair practices. On December 7,2007, the Office of the General Counsel of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) agreed with CCPOA on two matters and issued a complaint against the State of California (State). (See, separate PERB letters, dated December 7,2007, Notice of  Complaint and Partial Dismissal.)  

CCPOA vs. PERB - Official Complaint

It having been charged by Charging Party that Respondent engaged in unfair practices in violation of California Government Code section 3519, the General Counsel of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), pursuant to California Government Code sections 3513(h), 3514.5 and 3541.3(i) and California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 32640, issues this COMPLAINT on behalf of PERB and alleges:  

PERB Partial Dismissal - Dated 12.07.07

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California (Department of Personnel Administration)

Unfair Practice Charge No. SA-CE-1621-S (Second Amended Charge)

PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Dear Mr. Adam:

The above-referenced unfair practice charge was filed on September 25,2007, and amended on October 2,2007. The California Correctional Peace Officers Association (CCPOA) alleges that the State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) (State or DPA) violated  the Ralph C. Dills Act (Dills Act)...

PERB Complaint - Dated 12.07.07

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California (Department of Personnel Administration)

Unfair Practice Charge No. SA-CE-1621-S

Dear Parties:

The Office of the General Counsel has issued the enclosed COMPLAINT in the above-entitled matter. The Respondent is required to file an ANSWER within 20 calendar days from the date of service of the COMPLAINT, pursuant to PERB Regulation 32644.  The required contents of the ANSWER are described in Regulation 32644(b). If you have not filed a Notice of  Appearance form, one should be completed and returned with your ANSWER.  

Press Message 10-12-2007

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) Injunctive Relief Request No. 530 

Unfair Practice Charge No. SA-CE-1621-S

Dear Parties:

By direction of the Board, the request for injunctive relief in the above-entitled matter is denied without prejudice; sufficient grounds therefore not having been demonstrated.  

Package Offer - Dated 09.12.07

The State of California (State) hereby makes the following last, best and final offer to CCPOA to settle and conclude negotiations over a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

The State proposes a 3-year package offer which provides fiscal certainty for the State and guarantees specific and transparent pay increases to the members of Unit 6, the State's employees.

This offer is a formal offer and supersedes all others. This is a package offer which must be accepted or  rejected in its entirety.  

Letter from DPA - Dated 09.12.07

Dear Messrs. Adam, Jimenez, Weiss and Alexander:

On August 22, 2007, the State of California (State) provided a package offer to you. We received the California Peace Officer Associations (CCPOA's) rejection of this offer on September 5, 2007. Although we appreciate CCPOA's agreement to rollover language, CCPOA failed to address all of the sections identified on the summary sheet, and added other sections that were not a part of the respective sheet...

Arbitration Proceedings DPA Case No. 06-06-0299

This Arbitration arose pursuant to Agreement between the California Correctional Peace Officers Association Bargaining Unit 6, hereinafter referred to as the "Union, and the California

Department of Personnel Administration, hereinafter referred to as the "State", under which C.

ALLEN POOL was selected by the parties to serve as the Arbitrator. The Parties stipulated that the matter was properly before the Arbitrator and that his decision shall be final and binding.

The parties further stipulated that the interaction of Section 4.01 Management Rights and Section 27.0 1 Application and Duration, Entire Agreement imposes Dills Act obligations on the parties.

CCPOA Bargaining Unit 6 Package Offer April 6, 2007

The State of California (State) Herby amends its offer of March 22, 2007 by adding a 4-year option. This 4th-year option includes another year of general salary increases based  upon the "$666" formula, another year of increases for health benefits and modifies the retirement  formula for new employees hired on or after July 1 ,2007. 

Unit 6 negotiations - June 9th, 2006

By signing below, the undersigned acknowledge the they have full authority to bargain, and reach a... 

Supervisory - Enhanced Benefits

DPA Personnel Management Liaisons (PML) Retirement Formula Change for Supervisors and Managers in Positions Affiliated with Bargaining Unit 6 PML 2006-011 and 3.0 @ 50 ONLY

(Updated 4/13/2011)

Continue Reading...

Memorandum of Understanding archive 7-01 through 7-06

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Bargaining Unit 6 - Corrections

July 1, 2001 - July 2, 2006

Memorandum of Understanding archive 7-99 through 7-01

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Bargaining Unit 6 - Corrections

July 1, 1999 - July 2, 2001

Memorandum of Understanding archive 7-98 through 7-99

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Bargaining Unit 6 - Corrections

July 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999