Declarations for Case No. I.R. 542 (PERB UPC No. SA-CE-1665-S)

Case No. I .R.542

(PERB UPC No. SA-CE-1665-S)  

Legal declarations from Gregg Adam [support], Pamela Schneider [opposition] and Kristine Rodrigues [opposition].

Opposition to Request for Injunctive Relief

Gilb’s February 15 letter

Dear Mr. Jimenez:

I am in receipt of your letter dated February 7, 2008, in which you continue to mischaracterize and distort the status of Labor Management Relations with Bargaining Unit 6. I will address each of your false assertions below.

First, however, I must address the last paragraph of your letter, which threatens unlawful conduct by your organization and your members. As the CCPOA President, you state, "I will immediately consult the CCPOA Executive Council to call for a vote on a job action. which may include a strike." (Emphasis original). Your threat demands a response because, as you concede, engaging in such a job action "places California in a perilous position." As sworn peace officers it is incumbent upon correctional officers not to use public safety...

CCPOA writes to DPA concerning good faith bargain

 On December 27, 2007, CCPOA writes DPA contending that the issuance of the complaint letter by PERB triggers the parties obligation to resume good faith bargaining in accordance with Government Code 3517.8. (To date, there has been no response from DPA to CCPOA's request to resume bargaining.)  

MOU Letter “Demand to Bargain in Good Faith”

Dear Mr. Gilb:

On December 7, 2007. the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) issued an unfair practice complaint against the State alleging that the State cannot lawfully implement all three years of its last best and final offer (LBFO) which was imposed on Bargaining Unit 6......

CCPOA vs. PERB - Official Complaint

It having been charged by Charging Party that Respondent engaged in unfair practices in violation of California Government Code section 3519, the General Counsel of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), pursuant to California Government Code sections 3513(h), 3514.5 and 3541.3(i) and California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 32640, issues this COMPLAINT on behalf of PERB and alleges:  

PERB Partial Dismissal - Dated 12.07.07

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California (Department of Personnel Administration)

Unfair Practice Charge No. SA-CE-1621-S (Second Amended Charge)

PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Dear Mr. Adam:

The above-referenced unfair practice charge was filed on September 25,2007, and amended on October 2,2007. The California Correctional Peace Officers Association (CCPOA) alleges that the State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) (State or DPA) violated  the Ralph C. Dills Act (Dills Act)...

PERB Complaint - Dated 12.07.07

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California (Department of Personnel Administration)

Unfair Practice Charge No. SA-CE-1621-S

Dear Parties:

The Office of the General Counsel has issued the enclosed COMPLAINT in the above-entitled matter. The Respondent is required to file an ANSWER within 20 calendar days from the date of service of the COMPLAINT, pursuant to PERB Regulation 32644.  The required contents of the ANSWER are described in Regulation 32644(b). If you have not filed a Notice of  Appearance form, one should be completed and returned with your ANSWER.  

Press Message 10-12-2007

Re: California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) Injunctive Relief Request No. 530 

Unfair Practice Charge No. SA-CE-1621-S

Dear Parties:

By direction of the Board, the request for injunctive relief in the above-entitled matter is denied without prejudice; sufficient grounds therefore not having been demonstrated.